Sign up here to receive Bellingcat’s biggest investigations by email as soon as they are published.

WARNING: This report contains links to graphic images and footage.

A joint Bellingcat and Jeune Afrique investigation into drone strikes carried out by the Malian military adds new details about the attacks which frequently are carried out in civilian areas and have reportedly resulted in the deaths of civilians.

The incidents, concentrated in northern Mali, often involved strikes on vehicles or commercial activity. Video footage of the strikes is often broadcast on national television, portrayed as precise attacks against terrorists and their logistics. 

Mali’s military government acquired its first Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 drones in late 2022, and regularly releases footage of drone strikes to be broadcast on national television, describing them as “precise” and describing the targets as “terrorists and their logistics”. This month marks three years since Mali joined with Burkina Faso and Niger to form the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Its military government has made restoring national sovereignty a central part of its political message. 

Bellingcat geolocated more than a dozen drone strikes including instances in which civilian deaths and injuries were reported. However, this represents just a fraction of the strikes that have taken place in northern Mali, with many more conducted for which footage was not available or further details were harder to verify as the locations are so remote.  

Yvan Guichaoua Senior Researcher at the Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies told us the Malian military’s drone strikes appeared to fit a pattern of “guilt by location” in which people may be treated as targets based on where they are rather than who they are. 

He added that the broadcast of drone strikes on national television, often accompanied by dramatic commentary created a familiar narrative for veiwers that was akin to daily episodes “of a national saga”. Yet the impact of the drone war on civilians and non-combatants is seldom covered in such reports. 

Mali’s civil war involves separatist and Islamist groups and has been ongoing since 2012, predating the formation of the AES. But the conflict has spiked in 2026 as Tuareg separatists from the Azawad Liberation Front (FLA) and militants from the al-Qaeda affiliated Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) seized control of parts of the country’s north in coordinated attacks against the Malian military and Russia’s Africa Corps forces. The Malian military (known hereafter by their official name Forces Armées Maliennes or FAMa) has relied heavily upon drone strikes in response. 

We contacted FAMa and put our findings to them but did not received a substantive response at time of publication.

Destruction in Zouera

In one notable case – on July 8, 2025 FAMa presented a drone strike in the town of Zouera, in the Timbuktu region, as a successful operation against a supply vehicle for terrorists in footage broadcast on ORTM1 [4:50-5:31]. Drone footage shows a person walking near the vehicle before it is struck. The explosion immediately ignites a nearby structure, while several people can be seen running away.

One video of this incident, apparently showing the aftermath of the attack, shows the remains of a person inside the burnt-down structure, which was located directly beside the vehicle that was hit in the strike. We also checked satellite imagery and found a noticeable burn scar at the location in imagery taken on Jul 9, 2025, that wasn’t visible the previous day.

Bellingcat geolocated the strike site to the coordinates 16.84589, -3.85213, inside Zouera. Several videos filmed in the immediate aftermath show the destroyed vehicle, a large plume of black smoke, and the nearby structure engulfed in flames.

Information gathered by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and posted on X on July 11, 2025, stated four people were killed in the strike, including three young girls. MSF added that five others were treated for injuries at a local health centre, one of whom was in a serious condition. 

#Mali : Après une frappe aérienne ayant touchée le marché de #Zouéra, cercle de Goundam, région de #Tombouctou, les équipes MSF ont pris en charge ce mardi 8 juillet 5 blessés, dont un cas grave, au centre de santé local. 4 personnes ont perdu la vie, dont 3 jeunes filles. pic.twitter.com/cTdLiY9bG8

— MSF Western & Central Africa (@MSF_WestAfrica) July 11, 2025

Amasrakad Strike

Zouera was not an isolated incident. Footage from March 2024 that was released by the Malian military and again aired on ORTM1 showed two drone strikes in the town of Amasrakad that resulted in the deaths of civilians, according to witness testimony and previous reporting by Amnesty International.

The footage shows an initial strike hitting a parked pick-up truck before cutting to a second strike on a nearby compound, where several people can be seen running moments before impact. The first strike was geolocated to the coordinates 17.08402, 0.76204, by France 24.

Bellingcat geolocated the second strike to a structure within a nearby compound at coordinates 17.081613, 0.768012, where the drone footage shows several people scrambling before impact. Separate graphic footage published by the Spokesperson for the Awazad Liberation Front on X the following day shows several dead people including what appeared to be women lying in and around the compound. France 24’s previous reporting on the strike included images of covered bodies inside a destroyed tent, as well as an image of a child that was reportedly injured during the strike. 

Our partner Jeune Afrique obtained testimony from the man who filmed the footage. He said the second strike killed 13 members of two families, including several children, who had gathered in a tent for shelter after the first strike. He added that he helped take eight injured people to health centres. The man told Jeune Afrique he has now joined the separatist FLA group following the attacks.  

This testimony would appear to support a 2024 Amnesty International report that stated at least 13 civilians, including seven children, were killed and more than a dozen people injured. Amnesty reported speaking to seven survivors and eyewitnesses who said the first strike hit a Toyota Hilux used by the local health centre. Believing the vehicle had been the target, residents fled to a nearby compound to seek shelter. The second strike then hit the compound directly, the Amnesty report stated.

The FAMa claimed in an official statement just after that attack that: “These operations neutralised several terrorists and destroyed a significant quantity of military equipment and vehicles.” While the pro-Azawad separatist group, the CSP gave a different account, condemning the strikes and claiming that they had killed 13 of which a majority were women and children. 

We contacted FAMa to ask whether it maintains that those killed were members of an armed group, whether steps were taken to establish if civilians were present before the strike was carried out and whether an investigation was done into the reports of civilian deaths. We did not receive a reply at time of publication.

Two Strikes in Tinzaouaten

Some of the cases we geolocated had been documented previously. However, we were able to add new details about several strikes. The town of Tinzaouaten near Mali’s northeastern border with Algeria endured two major drone strikes in 2024, reportedly in retaliation for a major assault carried out by separatist and Islamist forces against Malian troops and Russian mercenaries. On July 30, 2024, the Malian military stated it had launched an air campaign around Tinzaouaten in coordination with the military government of Burkina Faso and had targeted “high-value targets”, including caches, logistics hubs and vehicles.

Bellingcat geolocated this footage posted on the day of the strike to 19.92476, 2.98003. The footage shows several damaged structures and what appears to be one casualty.

Pits and infrastructure which appear to be consistent with a mine are visible in satellite imagery of the area.

Bellingcat geolocated an additional video posted by a pro-Azawad media outlet showing destruction posted on X to the coordinates 19.92502, 2.98013. In another video geolocated to this site, a man claims he is at the “Inkharaban mine, near the Azawad-Algeria border.”

The Second Strike

A month later, on August 25, 2024, FAMa stated it had identified pickup trucks carrying military equipment in Tinzaouaten. It said that, “After careful surveillance, a series of strikes destroyed these terrorist targets and neutralized around twenty armed individuals.” On news channel ORTM1 the newsreader described the operation as “precision strikes targeting terrorist objectives”. 

Bellingcat geolocated footage shared online by the pro-separatist Press and Media Agency of Azawad showing the destruction at the coordinates 19.95107, 2.97284, in Tinzaouaten.

Bellingcat also geolocated two images showing casualties at this location. One image shows a group of around eight bodies, while another graphic image shows the bodies of two young boys around 20-meters away (19.9512, 2.97307). We could not confirm whether or not those pictured were civilians though a resident told Reuters that civilians were killed in drone strikes on the town.

Bellingcat contacted FAMa to ask about the two strikes in Tinzaouten in the summer of 2024. We asked the military what steps were taken to establish whether civilians were present when the strikes were carried out and whether any investigation has been carried out into the two strikes, but we had not received a response at time of publication.

In addition to the above incidents Bellingcat geolocated additional drone strikes based on footage broadcast on ORTM and added them to the below map. We were not able to confirm who was killed in the additional strikes but evidence we analysed show strikes often taking place within populated villages or against vehicles and fuel supplies.

Guess what?

Bellingcat is finally launching an official merch line! That’s right: after years of fantasizing and wishing, we’re finally ready to get our name and logo on cool merch that you’ll be able to show off. We’re working with a high quality, sustainable merchandising company to make all kinds of cool swag: coffee cups, caps, t-shirts, hoodies, and more!

We want your help designing the merch!

It’s not a Bellingcat project if it doesn’t involve you, our community, and our official merch launch is no different. As part of this exciting launch, we’re asking you to submit design ideas for the merch.

Close your eyes and think “Bellingcat”. What do you see? Draw it, write it, paint it—get original and creative, and send it to us! We’re only interested in what you can come up with, so leave the AI at home.

Our staff will review your submissions and pick the ones that we like the most. We’ll score them on originality, creativity, and how well they reflect the Bellingcat essence. If we pick yours, we’ll let you know and give you free merch with your design on it! 

How to submit your design ideas

To submit your design idea, simply upload an image via this Google Form. Once our staff reviews your submissions, we’ll conduct public voting to select the winning submissions. Our staff will let you know by November 6, 2026 if yours was one of the winning designs. We’ll then work with you to put the merch with your amazing design on it in your hands! 

For more information on the terms and conditions of the contest, make sure to read this page. Please keep all submissions appropriate for a general audience. Content containing profane, lewd, explicit, discriminatory, or harassing material will be rejected immediately without review.

The last day to make your submission is October 2, 2026.

Please see our FAQ below:

Will Bellingcat make money on my design?

Any profit from merchandise sales will go towards the Bellingcat Stichting Foundation, which will help us run our operations and keep our investigations independent.

How long will winning designs be in circulation?

This design submission is for a limited time capsule event. The designs chosen will only be available until the limited stock lasts.

What do you mean by a sustainable print on demand company?

The platform we’re using to create the merchandise is Fourthwall, which offers many sustainable print on demand providers.

Who will select the winning designs?

Bellingcat staff members will shortlist the initial submissions and then the public will be given the opportunity to vote on the final selection of designs and products which will be anonymised. The ones that receive the most votes will be selected for production.

What level of effort do I need to put in here? I’m not a professional artist!

Don’t doubt yourself! We want to see where your creativity takes you. Submissions are evaluated as creative concepts; final execution, text layout, and color formatting will be finalized by our production team. Bellingcat Stichting and its printing partners reserve the right to modify or adjust the design strictly to ensure compatibility with apparel printing processes, manufacturing standards, and brand guidelines. However, we will respect your moral rights as the author and will not make substantial alterations that harm the integrity of the original work without your prior consultation and consent.

What makes a winning design?

We will use three categories to score designs out of five. The three categories designs will be marked on are: originality, creativity, and speaks to our collective mission.

Can I submit more than one entry?

Brimming with ideas? You can submit more than one design to the contest. To do so, either combine multiple designs into one file, clearly labelling them as separate concepts, or fill out the form separately for each design.

The post Bellingcat Official Merch Design Contest appeared first on bellingcat.

Sign up here to receive Bellingcat’s biggest investigations by email as soon as they are published.

On a June night in 1996, in a basement apartment in Boston’s Chinatown, a killer put a pistol to the back of a young man’s head and pulled the trigger. The victim’s body was wrapped in quilts, lowered into the trunk of a car and driven about 20 miles southwest of the city, where it was dumped in the woods. It lay undiscovered through two New England winters until a dog walked home carrying a human bone. 

For three decades, authorities did not release the victim’s name to the public. He is listed in the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) as #UP12385, one of 202 unidentified people recorded in the state of Massachusetts. The circumstances of his discovery are reduced to five words: “Skeletal remains found in woods.” The case remains unsolved.

Bellingcat spent more than a year investigating in an effort to put a name to the victim. Using open sources, including freedom-of-information requests and newspaper archives, as well as interviews with investigators who worked on the case, we pieced together the story of the man’s life and death in an era before the internet kept a digital record. In total, we submitted 27 public records requests to 18 local, state and federal law enforcement agencies. We also contacted more than two dozen investigators, prosecutors, crime victims, journalists, experts and community groups connected to the case, though most said they did not recall the 30-year-old murder. 

We learned that authorities identified the victim as Fu Chun Wang, a 26-year-old undocumented Chinese immigrant who did not speak English. We also learned of a sweeping investigation into Chinese organised crime in New England in the late 1990s. Authorities suspected Wang was a member of the Fukienese Flying Dragons, a gang the FBI described at the time as a “violent offshoot” of the larger Flying Dragons crime ring.

Based in New York’s Chinatown, the Fukienese Flying Dragons were active across much of the East Coast. The gang trafficked migrants, extorted and robbed businesses, kidnapped for ransom and murdered rivals. Authorities believed Wang belonged to the Boston faction of the group, which was suspected of carrying out home invasions targeting Asian and Asian-American restaurant owners and staff across New England in 1996. 

Heavily redacted FBI documents and correspondence between local and state authorities show that a federal operation investigating the home invasions uncovered information about Wang’s murder and other crimes. The operation, whose name is redacted, was led by the US Attorney for the District of New Hampshire.

Authorities suspected that the Boston-based members of the Fukienese Flying Dragons were also involved in prostitution, illegal gambling and kidnappings in multiple states. Investigators examined possible ties between the gang and a suspect in one of Boston’s deadliest mass killings: the 1991 Chinatown Massacre. 

According to these newly released files, investigators received information that Wang had been murdered by members of his own gang shortly after Boston Police arrested and charged him for using credit cards stolen in one of the home invasions. While some gang members were identified as suspects and investigated, none were ever charged and convicted for the murder.

A Dog with a Bone

On April 10, 1998, a resident in Sharon, an affluent suburb southwest of Boston, called the police. Their black Labrador retriever had returned from the woods carrying a large bone. Four days later, testing by the coroner’s office in Boston determined it was a human femur likely belonging to an adult male. Police searched the woods, where a detective uncovered more bones near a bundle of quilts. Inside, they found a decomposed skeleton. 

A coroner ruled that the victim was a man in his twenties or thirties who was possibly Asian or Native American. He had long black hair with blonde streaks. There were at least two overlapping bullet holes in the back of his skull. Local media reported at the time that the victim had been shot “execution style”. A single, corroded .380 calibre shell casing was found inside the quilt. The victim was wearing a green-and-white striped rugby shirt, denim jeans and white leather sneakers on the night he died. Loose change, a pocket knife and a tarnished set of keys were found nearby on the forest floor. 

A botanist from Harvard University determined the body had likely been in the woods for at least 18 months. Experts from The Smithsonian Institution told police that forensic facial reconstruction would be “of questionable value” due to the damage caused by the gunshot injuries. 

Before his murder, open source records of Wang’s life amounted to a few scattered data points: interactions with authorities, apartment rentals, a loan application and a hospitalisation following a car accident. 

Police reports after his death show investigators pieced together a patchy collection of biographical data. He was from a family of five in Dongshan, a village in the southeastern Chinese province of Fujian, and was likely born into poverty. During his autopsy, it was noted that his teeth showed signs he had been “undernourished” as a child. He moved to the US to work in the restaurant industry and eventually joined a gang. 

Wang migrated at a time when thousands of Fujianese were arriving in the US every month in search of a better life. Like many migrants at the time, he entered the country without documentation. By 1994, when Wang met with immigration authorities in Boston, he gave his address as an apartment on East Broadway in New York’s Chinatown. Two years later, he was issued an employment authorisation card. Boston Police would learn from the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (INS) that Wang had been granted political asylum.

Search results on Ancestry.com suggest that prior to living in Massachusetts, Wang had also lived in Virginia and Vermont. Records from the Sharon Police Department corroborate these findings. In Virginia, police learned that he worked in restaurants and had applied for a loan to buy a car, a 1994 green Mitsubishi Mirage. 

In Vermont, Wang worked at a Chinese restaurant called Men-at-Wok until he was injured in a car accident in May 1996. After he was reported missing a month later, his car sat unclaimed in an auto body shop in Vermont until a bank sought to reclaim it.

Unclaimed checking and savings accounts at Fleet National Bank are listed under Wang’s name and the Quincy address in the Massachusetts unclaimed property database. The amount of money in these accounts is not publicly available, but the presence of unclaimed funds in his name, along with his abandoned car, are some of the many indicators that he met with foul play.

‘We’ll Kill Your Family’

In the summer of 1996, Chinese restaurant owners and their staff in suburban Boston and New Hampshire were terrorised by a wave of violent home invasions and robberies. Police described the suspects as “an organised group of Asian individuals”.

The modus operandi was often the same. In the early morning hours, young men barged into rooming houses while Chinese restaurant workers slept. Sometimes they robbed the business owners’ homes. Armed with guns and knives, the intruders tied up their victims before stealing cash and valuables. One woman who was attacked at knifepoint told police an assailant threatened: “Shut up or I will kill you”. In another case, a victim was stabbed.

The assailants were described as young men or teenagers. In several cases, victims reported that they spoke Fuzhou, also known as Foochow, a language originating from eastern Fujian Province. 

Jim Keating, a retired Sharon Police detective, told Bellingcat that many Asian gang extortions and robberies in the Boston area at the time were not reported. “They were all afraid of these guys, because they said, ‘We’ll come back and we’ll kill your family.’ And they would.”

In the span of a few months in 1996, similar robberies occurred in the Massachusetts towns of Bedford and Westborough, as well as Malden, a city about 10 kilometres north of Boston. These were followed by home invasions in the bordering state of New Hampshire, in Wolfeboro, Merrimack, Lebanon and Manchester. It is unclear if the home invasions and robberies were connected, but Bellingcat’s review of historic newspaper clippings and newly released police documents suggest that at least one other gang may have been responsible for some of the crimes. 

In response to the crime spree, local, state and federal law enforcement agencies coordinated investigative efforts. Bellingcat obtained files detailing a federal operation led by the US Attorney for the District of New Hampshire. It included agents from the FBI, INS, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Customs Service, Border Patrol and Royal Canadian Mounted Police, along with officers from state, county, and local law enforcement agencies in New England.

Ben Leong, a retired Boston Police detective, said Asian gangs committing robberies, extortion and home invasions against restaurant owners and their staff were common in the 1990s. He said many of these crimes went unreported for cultural reasons, over fears of gang retaliation, and because victims did not trust law enforcement.

“Back then there were many factions of gangs,” he said. “The gang members were recruited throughout the country, nationally and internationally. Law enforcement was always playing catch up to identify the prevalent groups, and the individual members and leaders committing illegal activity.” 

Leong, who is president of the International Organisation of Asian Crime Investigators and Specialists (IOACIS), said authorities had a better understanding of gang culture in Boston by around 1996 when local, state and federal agencies began sharing information.

Murdered in Chinatown

On June 9, 1996, one day after a home invasion in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire, Boston police were called to a Macy’s department store when a man tried to use credit cards stolen in the robbery to buy jewellery and electronics. He was arrested and booked on charges of receiving stolen property. The man was Fu Chun Wang.

In Sharon Police records, Wang was described as “very depressed” and “possibly suicidal”. He told a Boston Police detective that he urgently needed to send $1,000 to his family in China. Other records said his father was ill and needed money. Files found on Judyrecords.com, a free database that purports to include more than 770 million US court case records, show that Wang was arraigned and a court appointed a defence attorney to him. He was bailed out after pleading not guilty. 

Less than two weeks later, on June 21, Wang was reported missing to the Quincy Police Department in Massachusetts. The police report said Wang was last seen in Boston’s Chinatown on June 13, two days after he left jail. Police records indicate that a female friend of Wang’s had asked an attorney to file the missing persons report. The attorney who reported him missing told Bellingcat that he did not remember Wang. 

The Sharon Police Department’s murder case file notes that within weeks of finding the human remains in the woods, they received information from Boston Police and the FBI that “Wang was murdered in Chinatown” in June 1996 and “his body [was] never found”. 

Not all documents were released to Bellingcat, and some names were redacted. Fragmentary notes and witness statements provide the only clues to Wang’s final days. In handwritten records, Sharon Police said a man who was described as the “head of [an] Asian gang in Boston” had Wang killed over the New Hampshire breaking-and-entering incident.

A note in the Sharon Police file described a witness to Wang’s murder as a “Flying Dra” and a “NY gangster”. Retired detective Jim Keating confirmed to Bellingcat that Wang, along with his associates and killer, were suspected members of the Fukienese Flying Dragons. He said he believed Wang was murdered because he posed a risk to the gang following his arrest.

Documents released by the Merrimack Police Department and Sharon Police Department said that an inmate in New York who, in 1997, was serving a 25-year sentence for attempted kidnapping, offered to share information about Wang’s murder with the FBI in return “for a reduction (sentence)”. The inmate implicated the gang in at least two 1996 New Hampshire home invasions and also gave authorities information about the murder.

The account is heavily redacted but includes a note that the US Attorney for New Hampshire was making arrangements to interview the man. Police in New Hampshire said they believed the inmate “was truthful in his statements and has knowledge about the murder of Mr Wang”. Keating confirmed to Bellingcat that he and investigators from other law enforcement agencies traveled to New York to interview the man. He said the inmate, a suspected member of the Fukienese Flying Dragons, gave a statement on Wang’s murder. 

Keating said that investigators had learned of a dispute on the night of the murder between Wang and the gang’s leader. He said Wang had planned to run an illegal gambling operation at an apartment, which the gang boss was using as a prostitution venue. This led to an argument at another location, and when Wang left for the apartment the boss followed him. 

But Keating said that based on the information gathered throughout the investigation, he believes the primary motive for Wang’s murder was his arrest over the use of credit cards stolen in the Wolfeboro home invasion. With that arrest, Wang presented a risk to the rest of the gang because investigators could tie them to the home invasions. “Wang broke the basic rules by taking something that was identifiable and using it, and that’s what the whole damn thing was about,” Keating said.

Keating told Bellingcat that the crime scene had been damaged by flooding after the murder. He said he used a power saw to cut off the bottom of a door in the unit and that lab testing revealed the presence of Wang’s blood. 

Investigators also worked to confirm Wang’s identity by testing the DNA of the remains found in the woods. In a 1999 case summary written by a Massachusetts State Police Trooper, it was noted that the FBI was attempting to locate Wang’s parents through police in China.

Three months later, the FBI’s Hong Kong office sent a communique to Boston confirming that the Chinese Ministry of Public Security and Interpol had located Wang’s parents. Wang’s mother, it said, was willing to provide a DNA sample for comparison. 

The FBI communique is the final document in the newly released files that details the efforts to confirm Wang’s identity with DNA. However, Keating told Bellingcat that a DNA sample was obtained from Wang’s mother in China. It was brought back to the US for testing and confirmed to be a match, he said. “I don’t know when the DNA was collected or who did it. But I know that they did that,” Keating said. “There is no question about who he was.” 

Bellingcat contacted both the Norfolk and the Suffolk County District Attorneys to confirm the DNA match, but did not receive a response to questions about DNA testing or the victim’s identity. Other former law enforcement officers named in the files released to Bellingcat have not responded to requests for comment. 

One document included in the murder file references discussions between homicide investigators and the FBI about charging Wang’s killer with home invasion offences. The note discusses the potential to have a witness testify against Wang’s suspected killer. It is unknown whether he was ever charged. 

The Shooter

The man authorities suspected of shooting Wang, or ordering his killing, was described in the documents as the head of the Fukienese Flying Dragons in Boston. Police said he was an undocumented immigrant from Fujian Province who ran a sex trafficking ring. 

A redacted note in the Sharon Police Department murder file references Wang’s suspected killer as “a player” in the Chinatown Massacre, an infamous 1991 case in which five men were shot dead in a basement gambling parlour in Boston. In another note in the case file, investigators wrote that he was “thought to be a federal informant”. 

The name of the gang boss was redacted in the police file released to Bellingcat.

Keating said Wang’s identity was confirmed by DNA and that blood evidence, corroborated by witness statements, placed his killing in the Boston Chinatown apartment. The retired Sharon detective said at that point, the Boston Police Department and the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office should have, respectively, taken over the investigation and prosecution of the case. 

The Boston Police Department did not respond to questions from Bellingcat. It does not include the killing in its list of unsolved homicides. 

The Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office said it did not have records for Wang’s murder. “Unfortunately, after a thorough search with assistance from our homicide unit, no responsive records could be located,” it said.

In response to Bellingcat’s original public records request, the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office, which covers Sharon, said the files were exempt from public disclosure because they pertained to “an active and ongoing criminal investigation”.

A spokesman for the office said last week that the circumstances surrounding the remains of an adult male discovered in Sharon in April 1998 “remain under investigation” by a state police detective assigned to the Norfolk District Attorney’s Unsolved Case Unit. 

The FBI confirmed that the agency assisted state and local partners in an operation investigating home invasions in the late 1990s but did not answer questions about Wang’s murder or his suspected killer. “Given that we’re not the lead, we’ll refer you to Massachusetts State Police,” a spokeswoman said.

Massachusetts State Police referred questions to the Suffolk and Norfolk County District Attorney’s offices.

It remains a mystery why Wang’s killer was never charged and prosecuted for his murder. “They got away with so much. Blatantly got away with so much,” Keating said of the gang. “Killing people for these guys was like … these guys were all expendable.”

The Norfolk District Attorney’s Office encouraged anyone with any information about the case to contact the Massachusetts State Police Tip Line or the Sharon Police Department.

---

Melissa Zhu contributed research to this article.

Bellingcat is a non-profit and the ability to carry out our work is dependent on the kind support of individual donors. If you would like to support our work, you can do so here. You can also subscribe to our Patreon channel here. Subscribe to our Newsletter and follow us on Bluesky here, Instagram here, Reddit here and YouTube here.

The post Investigating a Murder: Public Records Uncover New Clues in Chinatown Cold Case appeared first on bellingcat.