17.05.2026 à 12:49
Fergus Shiel
A Ukrainian national indicted for her alleged role in a $340 million global cryptocurrency fraud scheme has appeared in court in Oregon after being extradited to the United States from Thailand.
Olena Oblamska, 42, also known as Lola Ferrari, is accused of being one of the four founders of claimed cryptocurrency investment platform Forsage, which prosecutors say was actually a Ponzi and pyramid scheme. Oblamska faces charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
Thailand’s Cyber Crime Investigation Bureau arrested Oblamska at a condominium in central Phuket in February, but did not name her at the time. She was extradited to the U.S. in early May.
Oblamska made her initial appearance in federal court in Oregon before a U.S. magistrate judge on May 12. She was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and ordered detained pending a jury trial scheduled to begin in July.
Prosecutors say she was the self-proclaimed “goddess” of a scheme that falsely promoted Forsage on the internet as a legitimate, low-risk and lucrative investment, before stealing about $340 million from victim-investors.
Dubai-based Russian Vladimir Okhotnikov allegedly directed, managed, and controlled Forsage’s operations. Okhotnikov, who also co-produced, co-wrote and co-starred in Kevin Spacey’s new film, “Holiguards Saga — The Portal of Force”, fled to the United Arab Emirates, while facing criminal charges from the U.S. and Georgian authorities.
ICIJ examined Okhotnikov’s business dealings as part of The Coin Laundry, an investigation into how the crypto industry has profited from illicit financial flows while leaving most of those harmed in the process without recourse.



https://www.icij.org/investigations/coin-laundry/holiverse-lado-forsage-cryptocurrency-scam/
CRYPTOCURRENCY The Russian crypto guru’s Hollywood gambit Nov 17, 2025
Recommended reading CRYPTOCURRENCY The Russian crypto guru’s Hollywood gambit Nov 17, 2025 CRYPTOCURRENCY Crypto giants moved billions linked to money launderers, drug traffickers and North Korean hackers Nov 17, 2025 CRYPTOCURRENCY Elite Portuguese investigative unit to probe Spacey movie producer with ties to alleged crypto scammer Jan 05, 2026
15.05.2026 à 21:27
Spencer Woodman
A quiet move by the Trump administration is allowing major crypto firms to skirt U.S. state regulators that have, for years, played a key role in policing dirty money in the industry.
Following a recent reinterpretation of banking rules, federal authorities have granted some crypto companies special, slimmed-down national banking licenses that come with minimal federal oversight and immunity against a wide range of actions by state regulators.
The sudden loss of state authority over some major crypto firms shocked Linda Conti, superintendent of Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection, which oversees licensing of money-transmitting firms.
“We will not be able to address consumer complaints,” Conti told the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in an email. “We will not be able to ask any questions of these entities.”
After a surge in cryptocurrency scams, Maine began requiring crypto firms to verify the ownership of certain digital wallets their customers were sending money to. The rule was intended to prevent would-be victims from paying scammers, but Coinbase, one of the world’s largest crypto players, cried foul.
In a letter asking federal authorities to intervene last September, the crypto exchange suggested Maine’s new rule was unconstitutional and “threatens the very purpose” of core features of cryptocurrency that offer users deep privacy. Coinbase has since converted to a national trust charter bank, meaning it will no longer need to comply with this rule in Maine, according to Conti.
Coinbase is not alone in obtaining the new licenses that can curtail state action.
Through a records request, ICIJ obtained a letter to Conti’s office from the crypto firm Fidelity Digital Assets, which recently converted to a national trust charter bank, telling local regulators that the company no longer needed its state money transmission license. In the letter, lawyers representing the crypto firm requested that Maine update Fidelity Digital Assets’ license in Maine to “Terminated – Surrendered / Canceled.”
Fidelity Digital Assets, the cryptocurrency arm of the investment management giant Fidelity, did not provide comment for this story.



IMPACT Canada revokes dozens of crypto firms’ registrations Mar 24, 2026
Recommended reading IMPACT Canada revokes dozens of crypto firms’ registrations Mar 24, 2026 CRYPTOCURRENCY Questions swirl around US plans for record $15B Prince Group crypto seizure Mar 18, 2026 IRS As crypto industry expands, US slashes office examining dirty money safeguards of cryptocurrency exchanges Feb 17, 2026
11.05.2026 à 06:36
Brenda Medina
The enthusiastic voice on the phone gave us directions the way people in many parts of Latin America do: “Go past the flower market,” she instructed, as we slowly drove down a street lined with stalls full of buckets of roses, daisies and sunflowers. Once we turned right, then left, then left again at the freshly plastered concrete wall, we would find the unpaved road, she said. “The house at the end of that road, that’s us.”
We arrived at Violeta Chuc Sam’s family home in the mountain town of Quetzaltenango, Guatemala, on a breezy Saturday morning in February. Chuc Sam, whose vivacious personality matched the voice giving directions, greeted us at the door. A few weeks earlier she had agreed to welcome our group of journalists to learn more about her mother Francisca Violeta Sam Colop. We wanted to talk about Sam Colop’s long struggle with skin cancer and her fight to access the medication Keytruda.
This reporting trip was part of the Cancer Calculus, an investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and 47 media partners, including the colleagues I was traveling with, reporter Jody García and photographer Laura Garcia from Guatemalan independent outlet Plaza Pública. Our team spent months examining the global consequences of the exorbitant prices of Keytruda, a novel cancer immunotherapy, known generically as pembrolizumab. It is the bestselling drug in the world, and has made around $163 billion in revenue for its maker, Merck & Co., since its U.S. launch in 2014.

Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. Image: Laura Garcia / Plaza Pública
I first came across Sam Colop’s name last August in a 2021 court order granting her access to Keytruda, which she could not afford out-of-pocket. By the time I found her case, I’d already been reviewing numerous similar judicial cases and would go on to find dozens more in the months ahead. But Sam Colop’s case stayed with me. In 2012, she was diagnosed with advanced melanoma, the same illness for which Keytruda was used to put former U.S. President Jimmy Carter in remission. She was an Indigenous Maya K’iche’ educator, a poet and researcher, and an advocate for the preservation of her people’s language and culture. I got excited about the possibility of telling the story of an extraordinary person, beyond what the court records could show. But then, another result appeared in my search: a brief obituary, dated July 5, 2025. Sam Colop was present in the legal document but the possibility of hearing from her was gone.
Months later, I was in her living room, as her daughters Violeta and Marina, and her widower, Juan Chuc Xum, sat below a large framed photo of a stoic Sam Colop reminiscing. Some of the books she authored — a K’iche’ and Spanish children’s version of the Popol Wuj (the sacred text of the Maya people) and her last collection of poems — were neatly arranged on a table nearby. I listened as they took turns telling her story. She was 65 when she died, but younger at heart, Marina joked. She loved to read, sing and dance, and always had a new project going on, Violeta said. She “always likes to be well put together,” said Chuc Xum, still speaking about his wife in the present tense. In 2021, an oncologist outside her government-run insurance system prescribed Sam Colop Keytruda, which by then was a standard treatment for advanced skin cancer in many countries. But her insurer wouldn’t cover the drug. Like thousands of people across Latin America, she had to go to court to force the insurer to do so.

Juan Chuc Xum (center) with his daughters Marina Chuc Sam (left) and Violeta Chuc Sam (right). Image: Laura Garcia / Plaza Pública
Despite the lack of transparency surrounding prescription drug pricing, our investigation revealed that the cost of Keytruda varies widely by country and even by regions and health systems within a country. A year of treatment can cost anywhere from $29,000 in Indonesia to $130,000 in Colombia, to $208,000 in the United States. In Guatemala, a country with modest income levels, the treatment costs nearly $11,000 per infusion every three weeks, or about $180,000 a year.
“Who could pay for that?” Chuc Xum told us, raising his hands, palms open, before answering his own question. “No one.”
Our reporting began far from the field. For months, we filed and sifted through hundreds of public records, analyzed global data and dug up court documents, to trace the real cost of Keytruda and the corporate maneuvers to maintain its high price and exclusivity. After finding hundreds of cases like Sam Colop’s in Latin America, I learned that a consequence of the high cost is that insurers and hospitals in several countries — with over-stretched healthcare budgets and little negotiation power with Big Pharma — largely won’t provide the medication, unless following court orders. The records quickly raised a broader question: What is it like when a medicine exists, but remains effectively out of reach for those who need it most?
I went to Guatemala to try to answer that question, where the lack of access to Keytruda for both insured and uninsured people seemed glaring.

Chuc Xum playing with his granddaughter on the rooftop. Image: Laura Garcia / Plaza Pública
When I found Sam Colop’s case, her family had been in mourning for just a month after her death. My colleague Jody García reached out to them and we patiently waited until they were ready to talk. The Saturday we visited Sam Colop’s family, they gathered at her house for the interview, as they used to do almost every weekend for family meals. But in a private moment, Violeta, the youngest daughter, told me that in the months since her mother’s passing, it had become rare for them to meet there. “It feels empty without my mom,” she said, almost in a whisper.
After winning her court case, Sam Colop received Keytruda for two years, though periodic shortages meant she sometimes went without treatment. Had she received the medication as scheduled, or even years earlier, her family wonders, would she still be alive? But as we found in our investigation, geography often shapes who has access to expensive and potentially lifesaving medication.
Marina said she finds comfort in knowing her mother prepared them in anticipation of her death, even leaving instructions in her final book of poems. Violeta said she still feels anger over her mother’s death and knows it will take time to accept it. Chuc Xum went down the list of habitual things he misses (seeing her at home, their conversations, going for a stroll — or for dinner — on a random weeknight) until he arrived at what he mostly longs for: growing old with his life partner.



https://www.icij.org/investigations/cancer-calculus/merck-keytruda-cancer-drug-price/
Recommended reading INSURERS ‘They deny the medication that is keeping you alive’: Patients wage grueling legal battles for lifesaving cancer drug Apr 13, 2026 OVERVIEW How Merck turned its wonder drug into a blockbuster — and priced out cancer patients worldwide Apr 13, 2026 BEHIND THE SCENES Going with the flow: How scrapping our itinerary helped us land the story Dec 17, 2024
ment altogether because he could no longer afford a previous medication (which costs almost $2,000 every three months). When Ramírez told him that he would be able to get Keytruda, and that he wouldn’t have to pay, Xum said he dropped to his knees.“A doctor alone does not prescribe that, it has an enormous value,” he told us, convinced there was divine intervention. “This is not human. This comes from above.”

Xum often travels hours from his hometown of Samayac to the public hospital in Quetzaltenango for cancer treatment. Image: Laura Garcia / Plaza Pública
Keytruda has shrunk Xum’s tumors, but he’s not in remission. He lives with side effects like skin rashes and constant diarrhea that sometimes force him to get off the bus to use the bathroom on long journeys, like when he goes to art festivals where he sells his products. Then he has to wait for another bus. But he is grateful to have the cancer under control, he told us.
My reporting in Guatemala was shaped by distance. The physical distance patients like Xum cross every few weeks to reach treatment. The legal distance in cases like Sam Colop’s, where access moves through court systems that can authorize care without guaranteeing its consistency.
In Guatemala, those distances are not abstract. There, we found what doesn’t come through in records: small, crowded oncology wards, hours-long travels on deteriorating roads, and the quiet endurance of families still wondering if they could have had more time with their loved ones.